Dusty Dog Reviews The whole project is hip, anti-academic, the poetry of reluctant grown-ups, picking noses in church. An enjoyable romp! Though also serious.
|
Nick DiSpoldo, Small Press Review (on Children, Churches and Daddies, April 1997) Children, Churches and Daddies is eclectic, alive and is as contemporary as tomorrows news. |
the July 2004 installment of...
Statue at the Punchbowl National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific (Oahu, Hawaii).
Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico 2003 Tiananmen Square, Beijing China 2004 flags over a bridge in Puerto Rico, 2003 Paris 2003 New Orleans |
Listening to people talk on AM radio about the Pledsge of Allegiance recently, Ive started to formulate my own opinion. There are those who want to eliminate the line Under God from the pledge, that this leads some to believe that the United States does not stand for Atheists or people who dont believe in the same god ss the ever-pervasive Christian God. But Ive always thought that if that were the case, then Atheists should be against our money (In God We Trust???), or for that matter be against the people who founded our country (even though they did not an imposed religion, they were for the most part quite Christian people...). I always thought that This is the way the opledge was written, and we should honor the way it was created.
Then I found out that the Pledge of Allegiance did not include references to God.
I read Joe Hertels editorial in Northeastern Illinois Universitys newspaper (v20 issue 16) INDEPENDENT. Hertel wrote The worlds Under God were added in 1954 to distinguish us from the Godless Communists ... so I realized not to make judgements until I actually research something. So I decided to search a little more.
I learned details from a a short story by Dr. John W. Baer (from http://history.vineyard.net/pledge.htm):
Francis Bellamy (1855 - 1931), a Baptist minister, wrote the original Pledge in August 1892. His original Pledge read as follows: I pledge allegiance to my Flag and (to*) the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [ * to added in October, 1892. ]
In 1923 and 1924 the National Flag Conference, under the leadership of the American Legion and the Daughters of the American Revolution, changed the Pledges words, my Flag, to the Flag of the United States of America. Bellamy disliked this change, but his protest was ignored.
The Story of the Pledge of Allegiance states (at http://www.flagday.org/Pages/StoryofPledge.html) that: On Flag Day June 14, 1954, the words under God were added. The last change in the Pledge of Allegiance occurred when President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved adding the words under God. As he authorized this change he said: In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in Americas heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our countrys most powerful resource in peace and war.
This was very nice of Eisenhower to assume our future allegiance to his God (though Id like to know what our spiritual weapons are...).
Dr. John W. Baer also noted that Bellamy had been pressured into leaving his church in 1891 because of his socialist sermons. In his retirement in Florida, he stopped attending church because he disliked the racial bigotry he found there.
So ... one can only guess that Bellamy would not have liked this change, either (especially considering that he even stopped going to church).
I dont know if it is proper to change the Pledge of Allegiance back to its original form. I understand that Amendments are added to the Constitution to make it better; maybe Im missing the argument that keeping Under God make the Pledge of Allegience better. But reading the words of the group to Restore our Pledge of Allegiance (at http://www.restorethepledge.com/), I felt I might not be alone. They state:
Currently there is a legal drive to remove those words. God in the Pledge has caused the divisiveness, discrimination and exclusion that the Framers specifically sought to prevent. Yes, the majority of Americans believe in God, and they nearly unanimously find no objection in the Pledges current rendition. But that is precisely why we have a Bill of Rights - to prevent tyranny by the majority, and to protect the rights of minorities. Our Constitution forbids government from endorsing religious views, and those who choose not to believe in a deity should never be made to feel like outsiders, as is now the case.
The words are liberty and justice for all. The Pledge should be a unifying experience for every citizen. Placing a religious ideal into its midst is not right, and serves no purpose except to alter a purely patriotic tradition into one that satisfies the religious bent of the majority. That is exactly what the First Amendment was written to preclude.
Janet Kuypers, Editor-In-Chief
In refusing to rule on the merits of Michael Newdows challenge to the Pledge of Allegiance, the Supreme Court attempted to stay out of the culture war between the (religious) Right and the Left. The American public has no such luxury.
Michael Newdow, an atheist, argued that the Pledges reference to America as one nation under God, constitutes governmental establishment of religion. The Bush administration countered that the pledge is a patriotic exercise, not a religious testimonial, and should be allowed.
This might seem to be a trivial case. But as part of a culture war between the Right and the Left, it has taken on an ominous significance. Both sides have demonstrated naked hostility to the independent mind: the Right, by its desire to force school-aged children to profess religious belief; the Left, by its demands for governmental support for secular ideas.
The First Amendment established what Thomas Jefferson termed a wall of separation between Church and State--a deliberate break with the then-standard European practice of establishing an official church by governmental edict and supporting it by taxes. The purpose of Church/State separation was to protect the right to disagree in matters of religion: to ensure that the power of the government would never be used to force a person to profess or support a religious idea he does not agree with. Government officials may make whatever religious pronouncements they wish, on their own--but they may not use the power of the government to promote their ideas.
On religion or any other topic, an individuals ideas are the matter of his own mind, decided by the application (or misapplication) of his own rational faculty. To force a man to adhere to a particular doctrine is to subvert the very faculty that makes real agreement possible and meaningful, and thereby to paralyze his mechanism for recognizing truth. The kind of forced agreement obtained by governmental edict is every bit as meaningless as was the Iraqis love for Saddam.
Yet it is precisely this kind of forced agreement that the political Right seeks, through its support of religion. The Pledge of Allegiance is a perfect example: in 1954, when Congress replaced its original language, one nation indivisible with one nation, under God, then-President Eisenhower expressed pride that millions of our school children will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our Nation and our people to the Almighty. This can only mean the attempt to demand religious agreement by the power of the government, which means ultimately agreement at gunpoint. Whether this premise is implemented by means of a nativity scene on public property, prayer in public schools, or the Ten Commandments in a public courthouse--the meaning is that the government should dictate the contents of the individuals mind.
The political Left has properly condemned governmental support of religious ideas--but at the same time, it demands that taxpayers support secular ideas, via National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities, among myriad smaller agencies. If the Rights attempt to impose religion by force is destructive of intellectual freedom, the Lefts demand that taxpayers support their ideas is openly contemptuous of the intellect. Liberals do not care whether you or I in fact agree with or approve of the ideas and images our tax dollars support--be they the latest collection of paint splotches or a Madonna smeared with elephant dung--just as long as we hand over our taxes. Thus, our minds have been rendered irrelevant, our agreement or disagreement pointless, as long as we serve as cash cows for the artist or intellectual to exploit.
Conservatives, who properly argue against public support for secular ideas, endorse the use of publicly funded institutions to promote religious ideas. Liberals, who properly object to religious displays on public property, advocate public funding for their pet ideas. Its politics without mirrors: each group feels free to attack its opponents for violating rights, as long as they dont have to notice that they are committing the exact same crime.
This so-called culture war truly is a war: a war against the individual mind. It is a particularly dirty kind of war, with both sides of the political spectrum vying for the right to enslave the minds of legally disarmed victims, and to do it by means of money expropriated from the victims themselves.
The only way to end this war is to re-assert the First Amendment, with its guarantee of intellectual freedom--and the only way to do that, is to get the government out of the business of supporting ideas.
Robert Garmong, Ph.D. in philosophy, is a writer for the Ayn Rand Institute (www.aynrand.org) in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.
WASHINGTON, DC -- The Libertarian Party has received an unexpected burst of publicity from major news outlets over the past two weeks, with one article arguing that a third party candidate running as an independent or Libertarian could sway the electorate enough to change history in 2004 if he or she received the kind of press attention that Ralph Nader has attracted.
I not only heard a few talk radio shows talk about this, but I also read an AP article from USAToday that a 22 year-old waitress without insurance was in an auto accident. Half of her brain was removed for corrective surgery. In fact, the USAtoday article reported that Lane, who was not wearing a seat belt, was thrown through the windshield. (She was later charged with driving under the influence and not having a drivers license.)
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA--THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GROCERY STRIKE, which seeks to establish health care as a right, is profoundly wrong, according to an op-ed released by California-based Americans for Free Choice in Medicine (AFCM).
Health expenditures have been escalating for years, but employers have typically resisted holding workers accountable to higher prices, AFCM contends. Americas employers are finally acknowledging the limits of employer-based, cradle-to grave health care coverage. They are realizing that health insurance, like auto, home and life insurance, must bear some relation to the individual that the insured must pay for the insurance.
Each person is primarily responsible for his or her own health care, AFCM insists. Benefits are extended at the discretion of the business, which has no moral obligation to pay for anything but the cost of doing business.
L.A.s grocery strike offers a stark contrast between socialism, which is based upon dependence on others, and capitalism, which is based upon self-reliance and independence, AFCM concludes.
http://www.afcm.org
|
Dear President Bush,
As a group of leading organizations dedicated to reducing the spread of HIV/AIDS and improving womens health worldwide, we are heartened by the proposal outlined in your State of the Union address to dramatically increase U.S. funding in response to the HIV/AIDS pandemic. However, we are deeply disturbed to learn that the Administration is contemplating an expansion of the so-called Mexico City policy to cover some or all international HIV/AIDS funds, thereby disqualifying from U.S. funding many organizations positioned to be key partners in carrying out your Emergency AIDS initiative. Any such restrictions can only impede progress in the battle against HIV/AIDS and erode the good will generated by the Administrations renewed commitment to funding HIV/AIDS programs.
It is our understanding that organizations using an integrated public health approach to prevent the spread of HIV and to treat and provide care for people living with AIDS will be disqualified under the expanded policy. This is indefensible. Governments and leading donor institutions throughout the world strongly support integrated family planning and HIV prevention programs as the best approach to improving public health. The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Sector Strategy for HIV/AIDS underscores that existing family planning programs provide a clear entry point for the delivery of HIV/AIDS interventions. USAID, the World Bank, the European Union and other leading donors in every region encourage integration as a matter of good public health practice and economic efficiency.
For women, access to integrated programs and services can make the difference between life and death. Women now represent half of those infected with HIV worldwide and 58 percent of those in Sub-Saharan Africa where the AIDS epidemic has taken the greatest toll to date. Integrated services offer women confidential outlets for voluntary counseling and testing, referrals for or direct provision of prevention of maternal-to-child transmission (MTCT), and treatment of other diseases. In addition, these services provide accurate information on sensitive issues, such as whether and how HIV-positive mothers can safely breastfeed their newborns; confidential access to MTCT; and a source of information and resources free from the stigma frequently associated with stand-alone HIV prevention programs. Such services are pivotal to preventing new infections and to improving the survival rates of those infected, while addressing other urgent public health priorities.
We represent a broad spectrum of organizations with a range of specific interests and points of view, but stand unified in our resolve to expedite U.S. assistance to those most affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic. At this critical time it is urgent to eliminate barriers to effective programs not erect new ones. We therefore oppose any expansion of the Mexico City policy and urge the Administration in the strongest possible terms to abandon its plan to expand these restrictions in any form.
|
By Rebecca Schleifer
Originally published under the title Prophylaxis, Pronto
The South African government has promised to provide universal antiretroviral drug treatment as part of its new HIV/AIDS plan. The governments recent experience of providing such drugs to rape survivors provides essential lessons as it prepares to implement the comprehensive programme.
In the face of South Africas explosive HIV/AIDS epidemic, rape and other rampant forms of sexual violence can be a death sentence for women and girls. In April 2002 the government pledged to provide rape survivors with post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)antiretroviral drugs that can reduce the chances of contracting the virus from an HIV-positive attacker.
This is a promising programme, one that could become a model for other countries. But Human Rights Watch found last year that government inaction and misinformation by high-level officials had undermined the programmes effectiveness.
Children, an estimated 40 percent of rape and attempted rape survivors, are especially harmed by the states failure to take their needs into account.
Many girls are coerced into sex and subjected to sexual harassment and violence by male relatives, boyfriends, schoolteachers and classmates. The stigma of rape and the shame associated with child sexual abuse makes it even more difficult for children to seek help. As the South African Police Service has observed, many children are raped by members of their own families, and these crimes tend to be kept secret. This compounds the problem because children are likely to need adult assistance in seeking post-rape help.
By law, children under 14 cannot consent on their own to PEP services or the prerequisite HIV testing beforehand. This poses problems for children unaccompanied by a parent or legal guardian, a common problem, particularly for children in communities hard hit by HIV/AIDS. There are provisions to obtain consent where no parent or legal guardian can be reached. But as Human Rights Watch discovered, many medical staff and rape counsellors either did not know or did not follow them. And where time is criticalas it is with PEP servicesthese bureaucratic procedures may take too long.
South African law and policy provide a framework for the prompt provision of health services to rape survivors. Unfortunately, service providers often fail to follow these rules. Police often respond inadequately, neglecting to assist rape survivors with seeking medical treatment or, in some cases, turning rape survivors away. Coupled with health professionals insistence that rape survivors file a police report to get medical services, these failures have undermined access to PEP.
The government launched its PEP programme in near silence, failing to provide adequate information and training about PEP. Many rape survivors did not get PEP simply because neither they nor the agencies charged with providing such services knew about PEP or where to get it. After years of vocal opposition to antiretroviral drugs, the government should have provided clear messages of support for the PEP programme to have a chance of success. But the highly publicised HIV/AIDS debate in government circles left service providers confused about whether antiretroviral drugs work and whether it was government policy to provide them.
In one case, a government hospital did not provide PEP medicines until a non-governmental organisation (NGO) worker explained to the hospital superintendent that doing so was part of government policy. The NGO worker told me: The superintendent was scared to give the antiretrovirals because he thought it was against government policy.
Now the government is gearing up to provide universal antiretroviral treatment. This effort will face many of the same challenges as providing PEP: public education, professional training and access for children under the age of consent.
Given its dangerous history of ambivalence on the issue, the government has an obligation to provide clear, unequivocal support for antiretroviral drugs as part of comprehensive HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment. In the meantime, the dual epidemics of sexual violence and HIV/AIDS will continue to claim the lives of too many South Africans.
* Rebecca Schleifer is a researcher with the HIV/AIDS and Human Rights Programme of the NGO Human Rights Watch
...from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_Belt
The Kuiper belt is an area of the solar system extending from within the orbit of Neptune (at 30 AU) to 50 AU from the sun, at inclinations consistent with the ecliptic.
Origins
The first astronomers to suggest the existence of this belt was Frederick C. Leonard in 1930 and Kenneth E. Edgeworth in 1943. In 1951 Gerard Kuiper suggested that objects did not exist in the belt anymore. More detailed conjectures about objects in the belt were done by Al G. W. Cameron in 1962, Fred L. Whipple in 1964, and Julio Fernandez in 1980. The belt and the objects in it were named after Kuiper after the discovery of 1992 QB1.
Modern computer simulations show the Kuiper belt to have been formed by the work of Jupiter, the young Jupiter having used its considerable gravity to eject smaller bodies which didnt all escape completely, and also having been formed in-situ. The same simulations and other theories predict there should be bodies of significant mass in the belt, Mars or Earth sized.
jones (part 7)Charlie Newman scraping up the dregs the morning after the night before says it all scraping up the dregs of dreams ground to fine powder and squandered in heat scraping up the dregs in one redundant motion after another scraping up the dregs to save what can be saved and hold what can be held scraping up the dregs ignoring everything else because its all just scraping up the dregs in a desperate fury of gnawing hunger scraping up the dregs on the floor and the table and the fingernails scraping up the dregs in the sink and the dirty dishes and the knives scraping up the dregs from needles and razor blades and scraps of paper scraping up the dregs from skin and bone and greasy hair and bleeding lips scraping up the dregs in filthy ashtrays and cups and charred wire screens scraping up the dregs in kitchens and bathrooms and closets and hallways scraping up the dregs in garbage cans and broken glass and old laundry scraping up the dregs in the bed and in the crib and in the arm chair scraping up the dregs in the yard and the driveway and the parched gutter scraping up the dregs in the eyes and in the blood and in the marrow scraping up the dregs in the heart and in the soul and in the spirit scraping up the dregs in filth and grime and stink and never ending shame scraping up the dregs in shit and piss and puke and pus and maggots and scraping up the dregs and scraping up the dregs and scraping up the dregs |
One piece in this issue is Crazy, an interview Kuypers conducted with Madeline, a murderess who was found insane, and is confined to West Virginias Arronsville Correctional Center. Madeline, whose elevator definitely doesnt go to the top, killed her boyfriend during sex with an ice pick and a chefs knife, far surpassing the butchery of Elena Bobbitt. Madeline, herself covered with blood, sat beside her lovers remains for three days, talking to herself, and that is how the police found her. For effect, Kuypers publishes Madelines monologue in different-sized type, and the result is something between a sense of Dalis surrealism and Kafka-like craziness.
|
Debra Purdy Kong, writer, British Columbia, Canada
I like the magazine a lot. I like the spacious lay-out and the different coloured pages and the variety of writers styles. Too many literary magazines read as if everyone graduated from the same course. We need to collect more voices like these and send them everywhere.
As for the fiction, the piece by Anderson is quite perceptive: I liked the way the self-deluding situation of the character is gradually, subtly revealed. (Kuypers) story is good too: the way it switches narrative perspective via the letter device is a nice touch.
|
Children, Churches and Daddies.
It speaks for itself.
Write to Scars Publications to submit poetry, prose and artwork to Children, Churches and Daddies literary magazine, or to inquire about having your own chapbook, and maybe a few reviews like these.
|
what is veganism?
A vegan (VEE-gun) is someone who does not consume any animal products. While vegetarians avoid flesh foods, vegans dont consume dairy or egg products, as well as animal products in clothing and other sources.
why veganism?
This cruelty-free lifestyle provides many benefits, to animals, the environment and to ourselves. The meat and dairy industry abuses billions of animals. Animal agriculture takes an enormous toll on the land. Consumtion of animal products has been linked to heart disease, colon and breast cancer, osteoporosis, diabetes and a host of other conditions.
so what is vegan action?
We can succeed in shifting agriculture away from factory farming, saving millions, or even billions of chickens, cows, pigs, sheep turkeys and other animals from cruelty.
We can free up land to restore to wilderness, pollute less water and air, reduce topsoil reosion, and prevent desertification.
We can improve the health and happiness of millions by preventing numerous occurrences od breast and prostate cancer, osteoporosis, and heart attacks, among other major health problems.
A vegan, cruelty-free lifestyle may be the most important step a person can take towards creatin a more just and compassionate society. Contact us for membership information, t-shirt sales or donations.
vegan action
po box 4353, berkeley, ca 94707-0353
510/704-4444
I really like (Writing Your Name). Its one of those kind of things where your eye isnt exactly pulled along, but falls effortlessly down the poem. I liked knowledge for its mix of disgust and acceptance. Janet Kuypers does good little movies, by which I mean her stuff provokes moving imagery for me. Color, no dialogue; the voice of the poem is the narrator over the film.
|
Children, Churches and Daddies no longer distributes free contributors copies of issues. In order to receive issues of Children, Churches and Daddies, contact Janet Kuypers at the cc&d e-mail addres. Free electronic subscriptions are available via email. All you need to do is email ccandd@scars.tv... and ask to be added to the free cc+d electronic subscription mailing list. And you can still see issues every month at the Children, Churches and Daddies website, located at http://scars.tv
|
MIT Vegetarian Support Group (VSG)
functions:
* To show the MIT Food Service that there is a large community of vegetarians at MIT (and other health-conscious people) whom they are alienating with current menus, and to give positive suggestions for change.
* To exchange recipes and names of Boston area veg restaurants
* To provide a resource to people seeking communal vegetarian cooking
* To provide an option for vegetarian freshmen
We also have a discussion group for all issues related to vegetarianism, which currently has about 150 members, many of whom are outside the Boston area. The group is focusing more toward outreach and evolving from what it has been in years past. We welcome new members, as well as the opportunity to inform people about the benefits of vegetarianism, to our health, the environment, animal welfare, and a variety of other issues.
|
Dusty Dog Reviews: These poems document a very complicated internal response to the feminine side of social existence. And as the book proceeds the poems become increasingly psychologically complex and, ultimately, fascinating and genuinely rewarding.
Some excellent writing in Hope Chest in the Attic. I thought Children, Churches and Daddies and The Room of the Rape were particularly powerful pieces.
|
C Ra McGuirt, Editor, The Penny Dreadful Review: CC&D is obviously a labor of love ... I just have to smile when I go through it. (Janet Kuypers) uses her space and her poets to best effect, and the illos attest to her skill as a graphic artist.
|
Dusty Dog Reviews: She opens with a poem of her own devising, which has that wintry atmosphere demonstrated in the movie version of Boris Pasternaks Doctor Zhivago. The atmosphere of wintry white and cold, gloriously murderous cold, stark raging cold, numbing and brutalizing cold, appears almost as a character who announces to his audience, Wisdom occurs only after a laboriously magnificent disappointment. Alas, that our Dusty Dog for mat cannot do justice to Ms. Kuypers very personal layering of her poem across the page.
Fithian Press, Santa Barbara, CA
Indeed, theres a healthy balance here between wit and dark vision, romance and reality, just as theres a good balance between words and graphics. The work shows brave self-exploration, and serves as a reminder of mortality and the fragile beauty of friendship.
Mark Blickley, writer
The precursor to the magazine title (Children, Churches and Daddies) is very moving. Scars is also an excellent prose poem. I never really thought about scars as being a form of nostalgia. But in the poem it also represents courage and warmth. I look forward to finishing her book.
You Have to be Published to be Appreciated.
Do you want to be heard? Contact Children, Churches and Daddies about book or chapbook publishing. These reviews can be yours. Scars Publications, attention J. Kuypers. Were only an e-mail away. Write to us.
|
The Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology
The Solar Energy Research & Education Foundation (SEREF), a non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C., established on Earth Day 1993 the Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology (CREST) as its central project. CRESTs three principal projects are to provide:
* on-site training and education workshops on the sustainable development interconnections of energy, economics and environment;
* on-line distance learning/training resources on CRESTs SOLSTICE computer, available from 144 countries through email and the Internet;
* on-disc training and educational resources through the use of interactive multimedia applications on CD-ROM computer discs - showcasing current achievements and future opportunities in sustainable energy development.
The CREST staff also does on the road presentations, demonstrations, and workshops showcasing its activities and available resources.
For More Information Please Contact: Deborah Anderson
dja@crest.org or (202) 289-0061
|
Dorrance Publishing Co., Pittsburgh, PA
Hope Chest in the Attic captures the complexity of human nature and reveals startling yet profound discernments about the travesties that surge through the course of life. This collection of poetry, prose and artwork reflects sensitivity toward feminist issues concerning abuse, sexism and equality. It also probes the emotional torrent that people may experience as a reaction to the delicate topics of death, love and family.
Chain Smoking depicts the emotional distress that afflicted a friend while he struggled to clarify his sexual ambiguity. Not only does this thought-provoking profile address the plight that homosexuals face in a homophobic society, it also characterizes the essence of friendship. The room of the rape is a passionate representation of the suffering rape victims experience. Vivid descriptions, rich symbolism, and candid expressions paint a shocking portrait of victory over the gripping fear that consumes the soul after a painful exploitation.
want a review like this? contact scars about getting your own book published.
|
The magazine Children Churches and Daddies is Copyright ©
through
Scars Publications and Design. The rights of the individual pieces remain with the authors. No material may be reprinted without express permission from the author.
Okay, nilla wafer. Listen up and listen good. How to save your life. Submit, or Ill have to kill you.
Okay, butt-munch. Tough guy. This is how to win the editors over.
Carlton Press, New York, NY: HOPE CHEST IN THE ATTIC is a collection of well-fashioned, often elegant poems and short prose that deals in many instances, with the most mysterious and awesome of human experiences: love... Janet Kuypers draws from a vast range of experiences and transforms thoughts into lyrical and succinct verse... Recommended as poetic fare that will titillate the palate in its imagery and imaginative creations.
You Have to be Published to be Appreciated.
Dorrance Publishing Co., Pittsburgh, PA: Hope Chest in the Attic captures the complexity of human nature and reveals startling yet profound discernments about the travesties that surge through the course of life. This collection of poetry, prose and artwork reflects sensitivity toward feminist issues concerning abuse, sexism and equality. It also probes the emotional torrent that people may experience as a reaction to the delicate topics of death, love and family. Chain Smoking depicts the emotional distress that afflicted a friend while he struggled to clarify his sexual ambiguity. Not only does this thought-provoking profile address the plight that homosexuals face in a homophobic society, it also characterizes the essence of friendship. The room of the rape is a passionate representation of the suffering rape victims experience. Vivid descriptions, rich symbolism, and candid expressions paint a shocking portrait of victory over the gripping fear that consumes the soul after a painful exploitation.
Debra Purdy Kong, writer, British Columbia, Canada (on Children, Churches and Daddies): I like the magazine a lot. I like the spacious lay-out and the different coloured pages and the variety of writers styles. Too many literary magazines read as if everyone graduated from the same course. We need to collect more voices like these and send them everywhere.
ccandd96@scars.tv
Publishers/Designers Of
Sponsors Of
Okay, its this simple: send me published or unpublished poetry, prose or art work (do not send originals), along with a bio, to us - then sit around and wait... Pretty soon youll hear from the happy people at cc&d that says (a) Your work sucks, or (b) This is fancy crap, and were gonna print it. Its that simple!
Hope Chest in the Attic is a 200 page, perfect-bound book of 13 years of poetry, prose and art by Janet Kuypers. Its a really classy thing, if you know what I mean. We also have a few extra sopies of the 1999 book Rinse and Repeat, the 2001 book Survive and Thrive, the 2001 books Torture and Triumph and (no so) Warm and Fuzzy,
which all have issues of cc&d crammed into one book. And you can have either one of these things at just five bucks a pop if you just contact us and tell us you saw this ad space. Its an offer you cant refuse...
Mark Blickley, writer: The precursor to the magazine title (Children, Churches and Daddies) is very moving. Scars is also an excellent prose poem. I never really thought about scars as being a form of nostalgia. But in the poem it also represents courage and warmth. I look forward to finishing the book.
Do you want to be heard? Contact Children, Churches and Daddies about book and chapbook publishing. These reviews can be yours. Scars Publications, attention J. Kuypers - you can write for yourself or you can write for an audience. Its your call...
Dusty Dog Reviews, CA (on knife): These poems document a very complicated internal response to the feminine side of social existence. And as the book proceeds the poems become increasingly psychologically complex and, ultimately, fascinating and genuinely rewarding.
Children, Churches and Daddies. It speaks for itself.
Dusty Dog Reviews (on Without You): She open with a poem of her own devising, which has that wintry atmosphere demonstrated in the movie version of Boris Pasternaks Doctor Zhivago. The atmosphere of wintry white and cold, gloriously murderous cold, stark raging cold, numbing and brutalizing cold, appears almost as a character who announces to his audience, Wisdom occurs only after a laboriously magnificent disappointment. Alas, that our Dusty Dog for mat cannot do justice to Ms. Kuypers very personal layering of her poem across the page.
Children, Churches and Daddies. It speaks for itself.
Fithian Press, Santa Barbara, CA: Indeed, theres a healthy balance here between wit and dark vision, romance and reality, just as theres a good balance between words and graphics. The work shows brave self-exploration, and serves as a reminder of mortality and the fragile beauty of friendship.
the unreligious, non-family oriented literary and art magazine
Scars Publications and Design
http://scars.tv
Children, Churches and Daddies magazine
cc+d Ezines
The Burning mini poem books
God Eyes mini poem books
The Poetry Wall Calendar
The Poetry Box
The Poetry Sampler
Moms Favorite Vase Newsletters
Reverberate Music Magazine
Down In The Dirt magazine
Freedom and Strength Press forum
plus assorted chapbooks and books
music, poery compact discs
live performances of songs and readings
past editions:
Poetry Chapbook Contest, Poetry Book Contest
Prose Chapbook Contest, Prose Book Contest
Poetry Calendar Contest
current editions:
Editors Choice Award (writing and web sites)
Collection Volumes
Children, Churches and Daddies (ISSN 1068-5154) is published quarterly by Scars Publications and Design. Contact us via e-mail (ccandd96@scars.tv) for subscription rates
or prices for annual collection books.
To contributors:
No racist, sexist or blatantly homophobic material. No originals; if mailed, include SASE & bio.
Work sent on disks or through e-mail preferred. Previously published work accepted. Authors always retain rights to their own work. All magazine rights reserved. Reproduction of
Children, Churches and Daddies without publisher permission is forbidden.
Children, Churches and Daddies copyright
through
Scars Publications and Design, Children, Churches and Daddies, Janet Kuypers. All rights remain with the authors of the individual
pieces. No material may be reprinted without express permission.